What to review
Keep the alternatives, assumptions and expected review date. Distinguish what was known from information obtained afterwards.
A practical example
A hiring decision based on a funded project differs from one based on an unexercised option. Recording that distinction helps explain the original judgment.
Keep the claim in scope
A good outcome does not automatically validate every assumption. A poor outcome does not prove that a decision ignored evidence.
Research and editorial context
Leadership evidence concerns the responsibilities a person actually held and decisions within their authority. The notes here are WCRC management interpretation, not a new ranking or an assessment of a named executive. Use the relevant programme method for a recognition decision.
Examples illustrate a decision and do not describe a named organisation's conduct. This is a reference note, not a new research finding or an award outcome.
Read the relevant WCRC material
These links provide WCRC context. Individual properties retain their own eligibility, evidence requirements and limitations.