WCRC

Recognition A–Z / Awards and recognition

Award conflicts of interest

A conflict can arise when a reviewer's other interests affect, or may reasonably appear to affect, an assessment. A useful process identifies relevant interests and explains how they are handled.

What to review

Ask what must be disclosed, who receives disclosures and when a reviewer should step aside. Check whether commercial and evaluation responsibilities have clear boundaries.

A practical example

A reviewer assessing an organisation with which they have a current business relationship should not rely on undisclosed personal judgment to decide whether the relationship matters.

Keep the claim in scope

A disclosure is a starting point for a response. It does not automatically resolve the underlying conflict.

Research and editorial context

An award claim needs the programme name, assessed entity, category and edition. Read the recognition process with the result. WCRC separates research qualification from optional commercial participation; communications and attendance cannot create or alter a research outcome.

Examples illustrate a decision and do not describe a named organisation's conduct. This is a reference note, not a new research finding or an award outcome.

Read the relevant WCRC material

These links provide WCRC context. Individual properties retain their own eligibility, evidence requirements and limitations.