WCRC

Recognition A–Z / Research and evidence

Composite scores and weights

A composite score combines several inputs under a defined rule. Weights express how much each input contributes, while the underlying measures still need interpretation.

What to review

Locate the formula, scale direction and treatment of missing inputs. Ask how sensitive the result is to a reasonable change in weights.

A practical example

A high overall score can conceal a weak result on one indicator. Readers may need the component values to understand the practical implication.

Keep the claim in scope

A precise total does not prove the weighting is appropriate. The rationale belongs beside the calculation.

Research and editorial context

A result is meaningful within its methodology. Match the research question, assessed universe and measurement period before making a comparison. These reference notes explain evaluation concepts; they do not add indicators, weights or thresholds to any published WCRC study.

Examples illustrate a decision and do not describe a named organisation's conduct. This is a reference note, not a new research finding or an award outcome.

Read the relevant WCRC material

These links provide WCRC context. Individual properties retain their own eligibility, evidence requirements and limitations.