WCRC

Recognition A–Z / Research and evidence

Comparability across studies

Results are comparable only to the extent that their definitions and methods support comparison. Similar-looking percentages can answer different questions.

What to review

Compare wording, response scales, population and fieldwork dates. Identify any changes before treating a difference as a trend.

A practical example

One survey asking whether a policy is important and another asking whether it is satisfactory measure different judgments. Subtracting their percentages would not establish a change over time.

Keep the claim in scope

Use a comparison only after the measures have been aligned. Explain material differences instead of smoothing them away.

Research and editorial context

A result is meaningful within its methodology. Match the research question, assessed universe and measurement period before making a comparison. These reference notes explain evaluation concepts; they do not add indicators, weights or thresholds to any published WCRC study.

Examples illustrate a decision and do not describe a named organisation's conduct. This is a reference note, not a new research finding or an award outcome.

Read the relevant WCRC material

These links provide WCRC context. Individual properties retain their own eligibility, evidence requirements and limitations.