What to review
Use the original category and edition for recognitions. Link an appropriate public record where one exists and keep confidential information out of the description.
A practical example
An award received by a team can be described as a team achievement with the person's contribution explained. It should not become a personal award through shortened wording.
Keep the claim in scope
A clear profile does not require exaggerating authority or inventing a comparative rank.
Research and editorial context
A career claim should describe a contribution that the person can explain and substantiate. Keep team outcomes and individual responsibility distinct. These notes offer questions for professional judgment; no qualification, promotion or employment outcome is guaranteed.
Examples illustrate a decision and do not describe a named organisation's conduct. This is a reference note, not a new research finding or an award outcome.
Read the relevant WCRC material
These links provide WCRC context. Individual properties retain their own eligibility, evidence requirements and limitations.